Please scroll down to the blog after the next one to learn the truth about what is really happening in Hampshire. DON'T BELIEVE what the LibDems are putting out in their pseudo newspaper.
Friday, 12 October 2012
Banner ads across blog control panel pages
I'm seriously thinking of relocating this blog wiht Wordpress because of the annoying banner ads I get across half the screen on the stats/control panel pages. I copied the ad and this is how it came out:
I don't know whether it's permitted by Google or whether my computer's picked up a bug, but they're ordinary advertisements and are really annoying and just found on those pages.
The Truth About the County Council
With a County Council
election looming and their popularity plummeting Lib Dems have launched their
usual negative campaign to scare people into voting for them and to paint an ugly picture of the Conservative run County
Council that they would like electors to believe.
They want people to think
that, because the Council has to cope with funding cuts in a time of rising
inflation, it is going to cut the services needed by local people - but nothing
could be further from the truth.
Their claim that we are
cutting back on Children's Centres is completely untrue. All 81 centres are open
and are now delivering the additional service of speech and language therapy
for children with special needs.
With a County Council
election looming and their popularity plummeting Lib Dems have launched their
usual negative campaign to scare people into voting for them and to paint an ugly picture of the Conservative run County
Council that they would like electors to believe.
They want people to think
that, because the Council has to cope with funding cuts in a time of rising
inflation, it is going to cut the services needed by local people - but nothing
could be further from the truth.
Their claim that we are
cutting back on Children's Centres is completely untrue. All 81 centres are open
and are now delivering the additional service of speech and language therapy
for children with special needs.
So is their claim that
there will not be enough school places for Hampshire’s children. No child in
Hampshire will be without a place in any one of Hampshire’s excellent schools that
are acclaimed for achieving above average results. Not only that, but we are
also providing funding for more apprenticeships to improve the life chances of
our unemployed young people.
Because of the efficiencies
we have made in reducing our running costs, we have been able to increase service
budgets to care for vulnerable adults and children by an extra £14 million this
year to cope with the rising numbers needing our care. Also we are setting
aside £45 million to fund the building of over 500 extra care units to cater
for our ageing population.
We are spending more money
on bus services than the districts and Boroughs had to spend and having
repaired the 30,000 potholes caused by severe weather conditions we are now
rolling out a multi- million programme over 5 years to make them resistant to
further such damage.
Unlike other Counties, all
our Museums and Libraries are not only open but improving the range of services
they provide.
Their claim that we are
reducing the number of Police Officers is also wrong. Not only do we have no
control of the police or its staffing but we also understand that the Police
have no plans to cut the number of officers.
Lib Dems deplore our new
initiative to use unspent funding from Councillors’ own budgets to broadcast, on
our website, our Cabinet and Council debates that allows the Public to see how
their taxes are being used.
Perhaps Lib Dems fear it will
show to the public their ineptitude in debate and reveal how wrong is their
description of the County Council they portray in the leaflets they push
through people’s letter-boxes.
Friday, 5 October 2012
Hampshire County Council Web Streaming
Yet again the Liberal Democrats have been very economical with the truth.
This time it concerns live streaming of Hampshire County Council meetings. They accuse the Council of wasting £220,000 on streaming council meetings, but the facts are very different, as explained by Conservative County Councillor Colin Davidovitz:
"Liberal
Democrats have consistently fought against the County Council’s initiative in
broadcasting its Cabinet and Full Council decision making processes that allow
local residents to actually see and hear what, how and why decisions are being
made on their behalf.
"Conservatives
are not afraid of people watching them discussing and debating the policies
they are making to cope with demanding situations, support and improve services
and to protect the wellbeing of the people they have been elected to serve.
"In
fact, this was only made possible because Conservative Councillors voted to
allow the unspent sums in their personal budgets to be diverted to fund this
initiative that allows local taxpayers to witness the decision making process
that has a direct effect on their lives, with out any call on funds from the
Council Tax payer.
"Up
to now if they wanted to see what went on at these meetings, residents had
to travel miles to do so and probably take time off work. Now if they
are not able to see the live broadcast of a meeting they want to see or have
read about in a newspaper or pamphlet, they have the opportunity to replay it
from the internet at any time to suit themselves in their own homes.
"One
can only assume that Liberal Democrats are scared of what residents’ reactions
might be when they are actually able to see their own pathetic performances and
the weakness of their contributions in the Council’s debating chambers. They
obviously would prefer that residents were kept in the dark, without access to
evidence that would enable them to question the allegations and
misrepresentations about the County Council that always dominates the
propaganda leaflets Lib Dems continually thrust through residents’ letter
boxes."
Residents can watch council proceedings at any time
The Liberal Democrats have manipulated the figures to make it look as if only 57 people, the ones who watched live on their computers, have seen the July Council Meeting, but as Cllr Davidovitz has explained, we can watch the meetings at any time. Figures for the January meeting show that in fact over 800 people watched it. That is a far higher figure than would ever have gone to see the meeting at the council offices.
To watch Hampshire County Council Webcasts visit www.hants.gov.uk/watch
Protect Our Countryside - Hypocrisy
I
20 is Plenty??
Eastleigh’s Liberal Democrat council has passed a motion to
impose a permanent 20 mph speed limit “in priority roads around our schools,”
and wonders why it hasn’t been rubber-stamped by Conservative-run Hampshire
County Council.
The reason is that there are very stiff criteria for
imposing 20 mph zones. They need to be
self-enforcing, thus requiring minimal police attention, so traffic calming
measures have to be applied. And these
will normally consist of speed humps and pinch points, as speed limit repeater
signs aren’t used within a zone.
For this
reason, they aren’t usually suitable for main roads with high traffic volumes
or strategic routes. Vehicles travelling
at 20 mph can significantly increase vehicle emissions and add to traffic
congestion.
The HCC
website says that under current legislation any speed limit has to apply at all
times, so it’s “usually unsuitable beyond the school arrival or departure
times, when traffic is not delayed by the school activities, therefore not
forced to slow down.” Due to congestion around
most school gates, however, it is very unusual for traffic to be able to do
much more than 20mph, so any measures to reduce the speed limit would be
completely redundant.
But the Conservatives have a better way. In respect of schools
situated on main roads, a 20 mph speed limit could be imposed when school
patrol warning lights are flashing, thus avoiding the need for costly and
disruptive traffic calming measures.
However, neither council
can impose the limit demanded by the Borough councillors, so it would require national
legislation and it would only apply to schools where a demonstrable need could
be shown.
20 mph zones with the requisite traffic calming would cost between £7,000 and £12,500 each, whereas flashing amber warning
lights and signs would cost a mere £2,700.
A school crossing patrol zone would cost about an additional £1,800 per
annum for salary and £260 for uniform and sign.
But there is
yet another cheaper and more effective solution. Hampshire County Council already has three
portable flashing speed limit signs, which are placed for a limited time
outside places like schools. These are
much more effective than permanent signs, which tend to be ignored, as they are
unexpected, and cost £3,000.
So our LibDem councillors once again haven't thought the policy through but fortunately we have a Conservative County Council.
So our LibDem councillors once again haven't thought the policy through but fortunately we have a Conservative County Council.
Thursday, 4 October 2012
Lib Dems at it again
Conservative County Councillor Colin Davidovitz has put out the following announcement following the shameful accusations in the LibDem Voice newspaper:
Lib
Dems are at it again. First they tried to scare the life out of young Mums by
telling them that their valued Children Centres were closing down, when every
one of the 81 centres across the County is open for business and delivering
even more services for young parents and their children.
Now
with the County Council elections looming, they are trying to scare people
again into worrying about there not being enough places for their
children in the Borough’s Schools - when the facts are that Hampshire’s
Conservatives are well ahead of the game and have been planning to meet
the increased demand for school places in Eastleigh that will be caused if the additional
9,700 extra houses Eastleigh Lib Dems plan to build over the next few
years go ahead and attract more people and traffic from afar into our
overcrowded Borough.
Even
now, under their direction, County Council officers are increasing the capacity
of the schools in the Borough to ensure that no child in Eastleigh will ever be
without a place in our award winning schools which are acknowledged to be
amongst the finest in the Country.
Perhaps
when the County Council elections are over next year and the truth is
there for all to see, we will be treated to the Eastleigh Lib
Dem Leader singing his apology on the Telly!
Don't Believe Everything the LibDems tell you!
In response to Liberal Democrat accusations, it is necessary to put the record straight.
Schools
Councillor Roy Perry says "Every child in Hampshire was offered a school place at the beginning of this term - well over 95% in a school of one of their 3 choices and almost 90% in their first preference.
"There is no
crisis, no shambles but there is a marked increase in the birth rate, and
people moving into the area which is certainly increasing the pressure on
school places. Measures are in hand to
increase school building over the next fifteen years so that there will
continue to be no shortfall."
Police
Hampshire Police
Authority state that there will be no reduction in front-line police
officers. Savings will be made by
cutting bureaucracy.
Libraries
Regarding libraries,
out of the 54 in the county, there will be no change in 17 of them and only an
average reduction of 2.5 hours in the rest.
Two libraries will be run by the community because of a drastic decline
in their usage over the last 5 years, North Baddesley by 33% and Stanmore by
50%. The latter is used by only 3% of
the population.
Buses
Despite LibDem claims to the contrary bus passes for the over sixties will NOT be affected.
Child Centres
4Children
vision:
“for
every child, in every community, to have the opportunities to realise
their potential – to learn, develop and
be with friends – and for every parent to access the support they need to build
a better future for their family”
This is what Hampshire County Council says:
We
want to make sure that the funding cuts have as little effect as possible on
the work children’s centres do with families, particularly those who need the
services the most. The changes we are thinking of making would keep centres
open and available for families everywhere to use.
To
achieve this, we are proposing an approach that would:
·
Keep children’s centres open and
accessible across the whole of Hampshire.
·
Take
half of the savings out of the County Council’s central costs of running the
children’s centre service.
·
As
far as possible, protect staff who deliver children’s centre services directly
to families - so that people who use the centres are affected as little as
possible.
·
Keep
enough managers across the centres to understand the needs of local families
and to organise and supervise activities.
·
Reduce
the costs of running the centres, for example allocating less money for travel
and equipment.
This is what Councillor Roy Perry said:
Commenting on the range of bids Councillor Roy Perry, Hampshire County Council's Deputy Leader and Executive Lead Member for Children's Services, said:
"I am delighted at the levels of response to the tendering process. We have had 17 bids involving at least 32 organisations with all clusters attracting more than one bidder.
"We have had significant interest from a range of local and national voluntary organisations and schools following the invitation to tender for the management contracts of up to 15 clusters of children centres. The centres will continue to deliver services through over 81 local centres and a variety of community-based venues."
In May the County Council approved the transfer of all its Children's Centres to third party management in a bid to secure the long-term future of Children's Centre services across the county and achieve savings in the wake of cuts in Government funding.
So don't believe the scaremongers! The children's centres are safe.
A Better Town Centre??
That remains to be seen. Fortunately, Sainsbury's have withdrawn their plans for extending their store so at least the Rec and market are safe.
But are the LibDems still intending to go ahead with their disastrous plans to move the civic offices into the town centre? To this, with virtually no parking space and thus inaccessible not only to staff but also to those who need to visit the council offices
From here
at a cost of £12 million. They say they'll recover £4 million by the redevelopment of the existing site.
Now that Sainsbury's have decided not to go ahead with their development, there is going to be a serious shortfall in parking for the proposed new council offices.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)